Thursday, 21 June 2012

Seeds: Blog: Who’s leading your weekend?

Seeds: Blog: Who’s leading your weekend?:

'via Blog this'


Leading change always begins with direction. Always. If you have no idea where you want to go, you’ll never arrive there, guaranteed.
Conveniently, it’s not necessary that the direction be perfectly clear at first, but in order to start you must always have some sort of goal in mind.
Steve Jobs knew that the device that could kill the iPod, and thus, his business, was the mobile phone. So rather than make a better iPod he got Apple into the phone business. That’s direction.
The idea to create a place where adults and kids could play together came to Walt Disney after a visit to local amusement park. I’m sure he had no clue that that initial idea would end up becoming the largest tourist destination in the world, but it did. Again, none of this happens without direction.
Direction is a certain sense that the future could be different from the present and that I ought to do something about it. Without that sense, without that knowing, change is not possible.
The second thing about direction is that it’s very personal. Almost selfish.
Steve Jobs wasn’t thinking about making the mobile phone you would want, he made the phone HE thought you should have, and those are very different things.
Walt Disney didn’t set up focus groups to decide what attractions to have in Disneyland, had he done so he would have founded Six Flags instead.
Great filmmakers don’t pander to their audience, they give them what THEY think the audience needs even when their ideas don’t seem particularly appealing.
When Jesus arrived on planet earth he didn’t fit anyone’s idea of what they wanted in a Messiah, but He was exactly what we needed.
This is what it is to lead. Leaders take people in the direction that they should go, not always the direction they want to go.
So… with all that in mind, who’s leading your weekend?

Wednesday, 20 June 2012

Church Audio Video | 1/4″ Connector Confusion Clarified - reblog from http://churchaudiovideo.com

Church Audio Video | 1/4″ Connector Confusion Clarified:

'via Blog this'

There is much confusion when one mentions the 1/4” connector. Guitar players and sound engineers are each seeking a certain type, but often have or are given the other. Let’s explore the simple 1/4″ connector that has come to complicate our world. 

Tuesday, 19 June 2012

How to Add a New Instrument Into The Mix reblog from http://www.behindthemixer.com/

How to Add a New Instrument Into The Mix: "Take a long look at the worship band and their changes over the years.  What do you see coming down the road.  What about the new church member who plays electric guitar in a band?  Could they be playing on the worship team in six months?  Don’t let your bias drive your mixing.  Any day, you could be mixing something slightly different or entirely different.  Be prepared by following these five tips."

'via Blog this'

Lighting Seminars at Entech Connect 2012 « ALIA

Lighting Seminars at Entech Connect 2012 « ALIA:

'via Blog this'

Entech Connect 2012, to be held on July 18th and 19th at Melbourne Park Function Centre, features many seminars that will be of interest to ALIA members. For full details go to http://www.entechconnect.com.au/seminars however lighting specific seminars, some hosted by ALIA, are listed below:

Monday, 18 June 2012

Church Sound: Church Sound: Who’s In Charge Of Sound Check? - Pro Sound Web

Church Sound: Church Sound: Who’s In Charge Of Sound Check? - Pro Sound Web:

'via Blog this'


Who’s in charge of a sound check?
While the answer could be, “It depends,” I would say 97.6 percent of the time in church settings, the house mix engineer should be in charge.
I’ll deal with the other 2.4 percent in a minute.
It’s For the Engineer
The main sound person should be in charge of sound check because he (or she) is the reason there is a sound check in the first place.
The band needs to play, vocalists need to sing, videos need to roll—all so the engineer can properly set gain and levels, and sometimes monitors.
Given that reality, who knows better what to start with first, and when to move onto the next channel than the engineer?
The worship leader might know when they have enough in their monitor, but they really don’t know when the gain, EQ, compression, gating and anything else is set properly. So relax and keep on strumming.
Good For The Team
Often times, sound people are treated like second class citizens. Sometimes, this is deserved—most times it’s not. Having the band take 10-15 minutes and defer all their attention to the house engineer is a good reminder that they too are part of the team and deserve some respect.
I speak with a lot of engineers who have great relationships with their bands. Sadly, that’s not the case in all churches.
A properly run sound check will go a long way in boosting the engineer’s credibility score, especially if the worship/band leader is on board. Everyone is better off in the end for it, believe me.
The Other 2.4 Percent
In rare cases, it may be beneficial for someone else to run the sound check. This is typically only true when the engineer is just learning how to actually engineer, or if they are new to the church, the system and the band.
In this case, I’ve found it very beneficial to take over the sound check myself and lead both the band and the engineer through it. This has a few benefits.
First, for the band, because they are comfortable with me, they feel good that someone they trust appears to be in charge. This calms a lot of nerves. For the sound guy, it allows them to focus on getting around the board, getting gain set, EQ and the rest without trying to remember the musician’s names or what order to go in.
It’s also good for establishing consistency. I want my engineers to run a sound check the same way, and by leading the through it, they learn the way I want them to do it. They learn how to properly address the band, and work through any issues.
As a bonus, it gives me something to do besides stand there with my hands in my pockets.
In even rarer cases, I would cede this control to the worship leader but only on two conditions:
1) The church doesn’t have a tech team leader (either staff or volunteer) to take on this role, and
2) The worship leader knows something about sound.
If those conditions aren’t met, the sound person needs to stand up, take the reigns and learn how to run a good sound check.
It’s really not as hard as you might think.
Mike Sessler is the Technical Director at Coast Hills Community Church in Aliso Viejo, CA. He has been involved in live production for over 20 years and is the author of the blog,Church Tech Arts . He also hosts a weekly podcast called Church Tech Weekly on theTechArtsNetwork.

Tech Arts Network » Blog Archive » Church Tech Weekly Episode 99: Life in the Hot Seat: Thriving at FOH

Tech Arts Network » Blog Archive » Church Tech Weekly Episode 99: Life in the Hot Seat: Thriving at FOH: " a panel at Gurus 2012 talking about life at FOH"

'via Blog this'

For those who mix Audio at Sunday Services

Friday, 15 June 2012

How to Analyze Your Music Mix - reblog

How to Analyze Your Music Mix:

'via Blog this'


How to Analyze Your Music Mix

Mixed by  on June 15, 2012 in Mixing.
Tags:  
How to Analyze Your Music Mix
Take the time to closely analyze your mix.
Photo provided by Ulrik - CCSA
Do you ask the right questions when evaluating your music mix?  Find out the questions you need to ask and when you must ask them during your mixing process.
You need to evaluate your mix throughout the mix-building process.  This isn’t to say you aren’t doing that as a natural part of the process.  There is a time, however, when it’s good to take your hands off the mixer and listen.  When you are listening to your mix, ask yourself these questions.  When you can answer “yes” to each question in each section, you are ready to move to the next stage in mixing.  If you answer “no,” then you need to modify your mix within that stage.  Each stage is a milestone.  Once you pass a change, you shouldn’t need to go back.
I’ve listed the questions below by each stage.

Analyzing Your Music Mix

A: Set Proper Gain Levels
  1. Can all instruments and singers be heard?
  2. Are sound volumes in the correct relationship? (lead vocal louder than guitar)
  3. Is the lead instrument clear in the mix?
  4. Are independent volumes acceptable for congregational preferences?
  5. Is the overall volume right for your congregation?
B. Creating the General Mix
  1. Have you used the high pass filter where appropriate?
  2. Have you removed / minimized bad sounding frequencies in instruments?
  3. Have you removed / minimized bad sounding frequencies in vocals?
  4. Does the kick drum have the right sound for the music?
  5. Does the snare drum sound fit the song?
  6. Do all the drum kit pieces have a blended, yet distinct, sound?
  7. Can the bass be heard distinctly from the kick drum?
  8. Do instrument frequencies properly overlap while giving space to each other and maintaining their natural sound?
  9. Have you made appropriate volume changes due to the affects of EQ changes on volume?
  10. Is the lead vocal still prominent after all channel EQ changes?
C. Creating the Distinct Mix
  1. Do the right instruments give energy to the mix?
  2. Are the instruments properly tucked behind each other?
  3. Do the background vocals sit in the right location for the song?
  4. Does each instrument have the right amount of presence in the mix?
  5. Does each instrument have the right amount of bite in the mix?
  6. Do the individual EQ changes benefit the overall mix?
  7. Can the lead vocal be clearly understood?
D. Adding Effects
  1. Does the use of channel compression benefit the mix?
  2. Do the effects benefit the mix?
E. Final Evaluation
  1. Does the mix match the sound which the worship team desires?
  2. Is it a mix that presents a worshipful sound?

The Take-Away

Mixing is an iterative process.  No matter how long you’ve been mixing, take a few moments during your next sound check and ask yourself these questions.  You might find new ways of improving your mix at each stage.
The longer you have been mixing, the more these stages blend together.  However, when it blends, it only means you’ve internalized the stages and don’t actively think of them as stages anymore.
In my book, Audio Essentials for Church Sound, I walk you through the process of creating a mix from scratch.  You start by learning how to set gain structure and move all the way through the process, including using effects.

Wednesday, 13 June 2012

The Four Reasons Every New Sound Tech Should Start On The Stage reblog from http://www.behindthemixer.com


Mixed by  on June 12, 2012 in Church Audio 101Ministry.
Tags:  
The Four Reasons Every New Sound Tech Should Start On The Stage
Ultimately, stage work builds the skills needed for working behind the mixer.
Photo provided by mindless - CCSA
If I gave you a choice between mixing and setting up the stage, I know which you’d pick.  However, it’s the work on the stage that gives you everything you need for mixing.
Recently, a discussion came up surrounding the best process for training volunteer sound techs.  Many people said they have techs start with stage set-up and eventually progress to mixing.  The idea seemed to be, “if you can handle setting up the stage then I’ll you can progress to mixing.”
Might I give a different point-of-view?
Everything you do, on the stage, drives your rate of success behind the mixer.  

The four reasons to start with stage setup

1. Builds band relationships
You are on a team with the worship band.  Spending time on setup gets the new tech the face-time with musicians to build trust and that team-work mentality.  This goes a long way to preventing the “us-versus-them” mentality.  A team with a great relationship is a team what works together.
2. Learn signal flow
The most common reason for not getting sound in a channel is a signal routing issue on the stage.  The responsibility of correct signal routing comes down on the shoulders of the sound tech, even in the cases where musicians set up their own equipment.  A new sound tech gets a great opportunity to learn all about signal flow when they are setting up microphones, direct boxes, and guitar equipment.  Combine an experienced sound tech in the booth with a new tech on the stage for the line-check process and you’ve got a great educational situation for the new tech.
3. Learn how to mic an instrument for your room
You can mic a piano several ways and get a different sound with each method.  Stage work gives new sound techs the opportunity to learn the different ways of mic’ing an instrument and what works best for the room.  One day they’ll be behind the mixer and instead of trying to “fix” a bad sound via EQ, they’ll know to try changing the microphone location.
4. See the sanctuary from the point of view of the musicians.
Being the sound tech is a high-pressure gig.  However, at least you don’t have everyone looking at you.  Every new sound tech needs to spend time on the stage just to know how that feels.  They need to know what it feels like when you are relying on someone at the back of the sanctuary to make you sound your best. Not only does natural stage setup help with this but any time during the service that a tech needs to run on stage, send the new guy.

The Take-Away

I have two take-aways for today;
First, if you are a new sound tech, please consider stage work as a crucial aspect of live audio production.  A great working relationship with the band, a solid foundational knowledge of signal flow and instrument mic’ing, along with a healthy dose of “what it’s like on the other side” will enable you to work your best behind the mixer and benefit everyone with what you do.
Second, if you plan on training a sound tech, consider stage work as an aspect of their training that will make them better behind the mixer, not just more rounded in their skill set.

Tuesday, 12 June 2012

Church Sound: Plugging In Your Church Platform - A Discussion Of Cabling & Connectivity - Pro Sound Web

Church Sound: Plugging In Your Church Platform - A Discussion Of Cabling & Connectivity - Pro Sound Web:

'via Blog this'



Plugging In Your Church Platform - A Discussion Of Cabling & Connectivity
We need to be thinking about cabling and connectivity, as it will affect future generations, perhaps even long after we’re gone
In my many encounters with church building committees over the years, there’s often an overwhelming theme: build a room that can be utilized for a multitude of functions including worship, theatrical productions, concerts, special events, dinners, receptions… the list goes on.
It’s a discussion of compromise and of thinking to the future. For example, wouldn’t it have been nice - 25 years ago - if the building committee had considered that there might be need of more than a “roamer mic” and organ at the platform?
Of course, caution should be taken when addressing the subject, because we may be talking to some of the same committee members who helped make that initial decision. That said, the same committee members may also remember the subsequent funding needed for more conduit and floor boxes for the stage, including cutting up the concrete floor to get this done.
Meanwhile, the sound crew regularly trips over a bundle of mic cables and faces the unnerving challenge of tracing a bad cable to the soloist five minutes before the service begins.
All of it points to the fact that we need to be thinking about cabling and connectivity, as it will affect future generations, perhaps even long after we’re gone.
What can we reasonably estimate to happen in the next 15, 25 or even 50 years?
We start by listing out what currently will – and likely could - be needed on stage. Such a list may include singers, preachers, pulpits, baptismal, communion table, drums, guitars, piano, organ, bass, strings, brass…
Next, the question becomes location. Can we really anticipate the exact position of each of these items in the years to come?
One answer is yes - we can anticipate positioning because we will control it with a stage design. This is a popular option among larger churches, but can be very unpractical for the small-to-medium church. The approach, basically, means designing the stage with fixed choir, piano, organ, orchestra, monitor mixing, and other positions, and the result is superior sound quality in addition to consistent entrance and exit to various areas of the stage.
The other answer is no – we can’t possibly anticipate accurately. In reality, this is the case in the majority of situations. But let’s back up. When discussing systems, I always have two perspectives: musician and technical (or “techie”).
The musician side of me wants a stage free of cables, with plenty of space to interact with other musicians and the congregation. And I want the ability to plug in any instrument at any realistic place on stage. For example, if the drummer’s in the back, the technicians should be able to mic all of the drums if needed.
Meanwhile, the techie side of me wants easy cable runs, clean signal, and happy musicians. The easy answer: provide a ton of wire and conduit from that stage to the control area(s). Not just to the mixing console, but also to video rooms, studios, etc.
This is not to say that you should have 400 mic lines running all over the place. But build in the flexibility to run individual lines, snakes, fiber, data or whatever else may be encountered now and in the future. Make sure there are several conduits; it’s cheap to do now, very expensive later.
Note that not all wires can be next to each other. Some electrical contractors may ask if it’s O.K. to use PVC conduit instead of steel conduit, and the answer is to use steel whenever possible. Steel offers a magnetic shielding from electrical wiring, while PVC does not. So using steel can go a long way to eliminating nasty buzzes and hums.
However, if the budget dictates PVC, make sure that it’s located as far away as possible from electrical and other wiring. And, always keep separate microphone, loudspeaker, video, data, and other wires/cables.
Floor boxes are your friends, and wall panels and plates are a welcome substitute for floor boxes. My recommendation has been boxes/panels placed strategically around the perimeter of the stage. Install as many as possible, but keep them invisible from the seating areas.
Also remember that it’s important to be able to get cables outside of the “performance area” as quickly as possible.
Now, let’s fill these floor boxes/plates. Keep things organized with simple numbering: Box A jacks are numbers 1-12, Box B is 13-24, and so on.
You can have literally hundreds of sound system inputs at the stage, divided between the boxes, without being excessive and without confusion.
It’s important to keep floor boxes cleanly laid out and organized
Jacks can accommodate a variety of inputs and outputs for other systems/uses as well, such as AC power, video, data, etc.
Drop snakes can also serve useful purposes. A drop snake simply takes the inputs of each box and links them to a new location on stage.
With a multipin connector-style snake, a multipin connector is placed in each floor box that duplicates the input of that box. (A mulitpin connector puts all of these lines into one connection, locking into place via a connector of the opposite “gender”.) Thus, all lines go through a single snake to a box or “ran” on the other end, which breaks out each line individually again.
This approach makes each input available at the box, and at the end of the snake. But it’s crucial never plug into both the input of the box and the same input on the snake: BAD THINGS WILL HAPPEN. The goal is to gain the option of connecting a mic cable to the floor box for input - OR - running the mic cable to the end of the snake.
An option to multipin snakes is fan-to-box snakes. These plug into each line individually, so the snake jacks coincide with the floor box jacks. This approach is more time consuming but much safer. All in all, either approach saves time and cleans up the stage.
All right, let’s say we’ve got all of these items plugged in at the stage, at various floor box/wall panel locations. For example, drums are on channels 9-15, vocals on 74-82, lead guitar on 4 and bass on 63. We’re using a 32-input mixing console posted at front of house. Wait a minute – our math doesn’t add up. More inputs on stage than at the console!
This is where we encounter patch bays, which allow the sound tech to simply take any input on stage and assign it to any channel on the console via a short patch cable. Think of an old-time telephone switchboard in terms of look and function.
Patch bays can be our best friend, but they can also present problems. First, a quality patch bay can cost $1,000 or more. And even at that rather lofty price point, reliability can be an issue.
The biggest way to avoid patch bay problems is proper installation, and as a result, I recommend a qualified contractor to do this. It’s a detailed, labor intensive process, which adds even more to the cost, but without proper installation you’re just setting up a disaster.
Patch bays can be helpful in addressing some stage interconnect issues
Another option is the “poor man’s patch bay” - a snake box, linked via its snake to the house console. The box, meanwhile, is usually mounted at a backstage location, ready to accept inputs running from the stage. You then simply take stage inputs and plug them into the box as needed – easy and flexible switching of inputs.
Also keep in mind that while a 32-input console may be in use now, there may come a day when it makes sense to expand to a 48-input board. Therefore, use a snake big enough to accommodate this growth in inputs, simply covering the extra inputs until they might be needed.
One note is to be cautious – don’t allow anyone the opportunity to plug into channel 32 on the snake box if console channel 32 is being used for a CD player.
Some of this may seem pretty basic, but the issues covered here come up with every project, time and again.
For example, you may be using a 24-input console now but may soon want/need to upgrade to a 32-input (or even 48-input) model. Run a snake big enough for growth and place a box with more inputs than you currently need. Simply cover up the extra inputs and indicate they are not to be used.
Also, don’t forget about those wireless mics, CD players and other items that may occupy channels on the board. Don’t provide someone the opportunity to plug into channel 32 on the snake box if channel 32 on the board is the CD player.
Again, some of this might seem simple, but it’s taken many people (myself included) three or more times of doing things wrong to get them.
While a qualified AV contractor should be able to accomplish these techniques, it’s important to understand the concepts and to be able to raise questions and propose approaches that work best for your situation – now, and in the future.